Triple
T8522711
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Eudicus |
E201731
|
entity |
| Predicate | workPhilosophicalTheme |
P3051
|
FINISHED |
| Object | beauty |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: beauty | Statement: [Eudicus, workPhilosophicalTheme, beauty]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: workPhilosophicalTheme Context triple: [Eudicus, workPhilosophicalTheme, beauty]
-
A.
philosophicalTheme
chosen
Indicates that a work, idea, or discourse centrally involves or explores a particular philosophical concept, question, or line of thought.
-
B.
philosophicalContributor
Indicates that one entity has made a significant contribution to the philosophical work, ideas, or discourse associated with another entity.
-
C.
hasPhilosophyAbout
Indicates that one entity holds, develops, or expresses a philosophical view, theory, or stance concerning another entity or subject.
-
D.
philosophicalConcept
Indicates that one entity is a philosophical concept that characterizes, explains, or is thematically central to the other entity.
-
E.
governedByPhilosophy
Indicates that an entity’s actions, policies, or structure are directed or constrained by a particular philosophical doctrine or set of principles.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca8321bb44819081b74df0b710276d |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:05 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cbe64215408190b45f462a32d3471d |
completed | March 31, 2026, 3:20 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cbd10f64b4819080859057c19e58f0 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 1:50 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:16 p.m.