Triple
T8521325
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | LynxOS |
E201698
|
entity |
| Predicate | supportsDevelopmentLanguage |
P83124
|
FINISHED |
| Object | C |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: C | Statement: [LynxOS, supportsDevelopmentLanguage, C]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsDevelopmentLanguage Context triple: [LynxOS, supportsDevelopmentLanguage, C]
-
A.
developedForLanguage
Indicates that something (such as a tool, system, or resource) was specifically created or adapted to be used with a particular language.
-
B.
developedWith
Indicates that something was created, built, or produced using a specified tool, technology, method, or collaborator.
-
C.
supportsLanguageVersion
Indicates that one entity provides compatibility with, or can correctly operate using, a specified version of a language.
-
D.
implementedInLanguage
Indicates that a piece of software or code is written using a particular programming language.
-
E.
hasDevelopmentStatus
Indicates the current stage or condition of progress or completion that something is in.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca8321bb44819081b74df0b710276d |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:05 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cbe62a490481908ee0ad4ba9a94682 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 3:20 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cbd10f64b4819080859057c19e58f0 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 1:50 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69cbe30d453481908f897ed2b06e7534 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 3:06 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:16 p.m.