Triple
T8519589
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | 1884 United States presidential election |
E201662
|
entity |
| Predicate | notableScandal |
P29490
|
FINISHED |
| Object | James G. Blaine corruption allegations |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: James G. Blaine corruption allegations | Statement: [1884 United States presidential election, notableScandal, James G. Blaine corruption allegations]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: notableScandal Context triple: [1884 United States presidential election, notableScandal, James G. Blaine corruption allegations]
-
A.
associatedScandal
chosen
Indicates a relationship where an entity is linked to, involved in, or notably connected with a particular scandal.
-
B.
timeOfMajorScandal
Indicates the specific time period during which a major scandal involving the entity occurred.
-
C.
notableGaffe
Indicates that an entity is known for having made a significant mistake, blunder, or embarrassing error.
-
D.
notableStory
Indicates that an entity is the subject or source of a story, account, or narrative that is considered notable or significant.
-
E.
notableTheft
Indicates that an entity is involved in a theft event that is widely recognized or significant in some notable way.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca8321bb44819081b74df0b710276d |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:05 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cbe627de908190b463da0f26da4ffb |
completed | March 31, 2026, 3:20 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cbd10f64b4819080859057c19e58f0 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 1:50 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:16 p.m.