Triple

T8502802
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject ESP E201262 entity
Predicate oftenReportedIn P5303 FINISHED
Object anecdotal accounts LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: anecdotal accounts | Statement: [ESP, oftenReportedIn, anecdotal accounts]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: oftenReportedIn
Context triple: [ESP, oftenReportedIn, anecdotal accounts]
  • A. frequentlyDiscussedIn chosen
    Indicates that a topic, subject, or entity is often the focus of conversation, debate, or mention within a particular context or medium.
  • B. officiallyReports
    Indicates that one entity formally provides information, updates, or accountability to another entity within an official or authorized reporting structure.
  • C. mayReportTo
    Indicates that one entity is permitted or allowed to have a reporting relationship to another entity, such as an employee being allowed to report to a particular manager.
  • D. oftenAnalyzedIn
    Indicates that something is frequently examined, studied, or evaluated within a particular context, field, or framework.
  • E. frequentlyRecordedBy
    Indicates that an entity is often documented, captured, or logged by a particular agent, system, or recording process.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca831fe47c8190b5c57b456d2aefa0 completed March 30, 2026, 2:05 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cbe59c413881909513d8a9d52333c0 completed March 31, 2026, 3:17 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cbd10cfd208190a519049fad32c508 completed March 31, 2026, 1:50 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:14 p.m.