Triple
T8493535
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Captain Bill Owens |
E201034
|
entity |
| Predicate | riskLevelOfMission |
P3842
|
FINISHED |
| Object | life-threatening |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: life-threatening | Statement: [Captain Bill Owens, riskLevelOfMission, life-threatening]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: riskLevelOfMission Context triple: [Captain Bill Owens, riskLevelOfMission, life-threatening]
-
A.
riskLevel
chosen
Indicates the degree of potential harm, loss, or adverse outcome associated with a particular situation, action, or entity.
-
B.
riskType
Indicates the category or nature of risk associated with an entity, event, or relationship.
-
C.
riskTaken
Indicates that an entity has undertaken an action or decision involving exposure to potential loss, harm, or uncertainty.
-
D.
riskZone
Indicates that an entity is located within or associated with an area characterized by elevated danger, threat, or potential harm.
-
E.
riskElement
Indicates that one entity is a risk-related component, factor, or contributor associated with another entity within a risk context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca831ee390819095fae73400bbfafc |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:05 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cbe579b7088190b297b04527e36a2b |
completed | March 31, 2026, 3:17 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cbd10a4b0881909e254117780dc823 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 1:50 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:13 p.m.