Triple

T8468107
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Los Angeles County jail system E200213 entity
Predicate securityLevels P60827 FINISHED
Object minimum security LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: minimum security | Statement: [Los Angeles County jail system, securityLevels, minimum security]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: securityLevels
Context triple: [Los Angeles County jail system, securityLevels, minimum security]
  • A. securityLevelComponents
    Indicates that a particular security level is composed of, or associated with, a specific set of component elements or factors.
  • B. typicalSecurityLevel chosen
    Indicates the usual or standard security level that is generally applied or expected in a given context or system.
  • C. encryptionLevel
    Indicates the degree or strength of cryptographic protection applied to data or communications.
  • D. securityGranularity
    Indicates the level of detail or specificity at which security controls, permissions, or protections are defined and applied within a system or context.
  • E. securityType
    Indicates the classification or category of security associated with an entity, such as the type of financial instrument, protection mechanism, or access control applied.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca831a4f348190bfdd09250e86ae35 completed March 30, 2026, 2:05 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cbe4d445f48190884df64bb1aebd41 completed March 31, 2026, 3:14 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cbd10072cc819084be1ed9ac7ebe9d completed March 31, 2026, 1:49 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:11 p.m.