Triple

T8451523
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject .yt E199809 entity
Predicate administrativeRelationship P37165 FINISHED
Object overseas department of France LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: overseas department of France | Statement: [.yt, administrativeRelationship, overseas department of France]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: administrativeRelationship
Context triple: [.yt, administrativeRelationship, overseas department of France]
  • A. identityRelation
    Indicates that two entities are in fact the very same entity, not merely similar or equivalent.
  • B. associatedWithAdministration chosen
    Indicates a relationship in which an entity is connected to, involved in, or under the responsibility of an administrative body, process, or function.
  • C. reportsRelationship
    Indicates that one entity formally provides information, findings, or status about another entity or situation.
  • D. parentRelationship
    Indicates a familial relationship in which one entity is the parent of another entity.
  • E. laterRelationWith
    Indicates that one entity stands in a temporal relationship to another such that it occurs or exists at a later time than the other.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca8318231881908fd1bc1c4d45d286 completed March 30, 2026, 2:05 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cbe44815488190a912d63512e19af0 completed March 31, 2026, 3:12 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cbd0fc634481909842c0a30077bfde completed March 31, 2026, 1:49 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:09 p.m.