Triple
T8444615
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Treasure State |
E199641
|
entity |
| Predicate | refersTo |
P37
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Montana |
E38848
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Montana | Statement: [Treasure State, refersTo, Montana]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Montana Context triple: [Treasure State, refersTo, Montana]
-
A.
Montana
chosen
Montana is a large, sparsely populated U.S. state in the northern Rocky Mountains known for its expansive wilderness, national parks like Glacier, and wide-open "Big Sky" landscapes.
-
B.
Montana
Montana was a former Swiss alpine resort municipality that later became part of the larger resort area of Crans-Montana in the canton of Valais.
-
C.
Wyoming
Wyoming is a sparsely populated U.S. state known for its vast plains, the Rocky Mountains, and iconic national parks like Yellowstone and Grand Teton.
-
D.
Wyoming
Wyoming is a small borough in Luzerne County, Pennsylvania, situated in the historic Wyoming Valley along the Susquehanna River.
-
E.
D. Mont.
D. Mont. is the standard legal abbreviation for the United States District Court for the District of Montana, a federal trial court within the U.S. judiciary.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca83170f9081909cd98f55614c6476 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:05 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cbe3122cfc8190ac6103fa4e4a7c45 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 3:06 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69ce88bc6b008190a93fbd41089d6c72 |
completed | April 2, 2026, 3:18 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:09 p.m.