Triple
T8435759
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Original Chip Set |
E199218
|
entity |
| Predicate | maxChipRAM |
P53401
|
FINISHED |
| Object | up to 512 KB in early systems |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: up to 512 KB in early systems | Statement: [Original Chip Set, maxChipRAM, up to 512 KB in early systems]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: maxChipRAM Context triple: [Original Chip Set, maxChipRAM, up to 512 KB in early systems]
-
A.
maxRAMUnofficial
Indicates the maximum amount of RAM that can be used or installed in an unofficial or unsupported configuration.
-
B.
maxRAMOfficial
chosen
Indicates the officially specified maximum amount of RAM that is supported or allowed for an entity (such as a device or system).
-
C.
minRAM
Indicates that an entity requires at least a specified minimum amount of RAM to function or be considered valid.
-
D.
typicalRAMRangeMB
Indicates the usual or expected range of RAM capacity, measured in megabytes, associated with an entity.
-
E.
maxMemoryChannels
Indicates the maximum number of memory channels that an entity can support or utilize.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca8314cd6c8190a6b8c2a1096e18f3 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:05 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cbe30fba4081908bfdef3faf5baceb |
completed | March 31, 2026, 3:06 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cbd0ec200c8190b0299e2b0b4bdcc2 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 1:49 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:08 p.m.