Triple

T8429726
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Honky Château E199087 entity
Predicate hasCreativeBreakthroughReputation P83300 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Honky Château, hasCreativeBreakthroughReputation, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasCreativeBreakthroughReputation
Context triple: [Honky Château, hasCreativeBreakthroughReputation, true]
  • A. hasBreakthroughWork
    Indicates that an entity has produced a significant, pioneering work that marks a major advance or turning point in its field or domain.
  • B. breakthroughBy
    Indicates that a significant discovery, innovation, or advance was achieved or brought about by a particular agent or entity.
  • C. dateOfBreakthrough
    Indicates the specific date on which a significant breakthrough or major advance occurred.
  • D. hasNotableRecognitionFor
    Indicates that an entity has received notable recognition, such as awards, honors, or distinctions, specifically for another entity or achievement.
  • E. markedBreakthroughOf
    Indicates that an event, action, or development signified a major breakthrough or turning point for something.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca8313c99081909a5c6d83b91de5b3 completed March 30, 2026, 2:05 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cbe30fba4081908bfdef3faf5baceb completed March 31, 2026, 3:06 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cbd0ec200c8190b0299e2b0b4bdcc2 completed March 31, 2026, 1:49 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69cbe30c2d088190b4cb89adb4e88273 completed March 31, 2026, 3:06 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:07 p.m.