Triple
T8417605
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | We Are Penn State chant |
E198765
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasCall |
P82078
|
FINISHED |
| Object | We Are |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: We Are | Statement: [We Are Penn State chant, hasCall, We Are]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasCall Context triple: [We Are Penn State chant, hasCall, We Are]
-
A.
hasCallInNumber
Indicates that an entity has an associated telephone number designated for receiving incoming calls.
-
B.
holderCalled
Indicates that one entity, acting as a holder or possessor, initiated a phone call or communication to another entity.
-
C.
nowCalled
Indicates that an entity previously known by one name is currently referred to by a different name.
-
D.
calledAs
Indicates that one entity is referred to, named, or addressed by another specific name or label.
-
E.
hasCallToAction
Indicates that one entity includes or presents a prompt urging another entity to take a specific action.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca831201b481909e137936ef99ff11 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:05 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb84c66b5c8190b9515f55dc08ac03 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 8:24 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cb70d70ea081909c3dc1bd2ec14f85 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 6:59 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69cb77690720819099de1e22b84a9563 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 7:27 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:06 p.m.