Triple
T8416210
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | The Party |
E198735
|
entity |
| Predicate | enforcesDoctrine |
P82058
|
FINISHED |
| Object | doublethink |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: doublethink | Statement: [The Party, enforcesDoctrine, doublethink]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: enforcesDoctrine Context triple: [The Party, enforcesDoctrine, doublethink]
-
A.
reinforcedDoctrine
Indicates that one entity strengthened, supported, or further entrenched a particular doctrine or set of beliefs in another entity or context.
-
B.
followsDoctrine
Indicates that one entity adheres to, complies with, or acts in accordance with a specified doctrine or set of guiding principles.
-
C.
confirmedDoctrine
Indicates that an authority has officially validated, endorsed, or ratified a particular doctrine as true or acceptable.
-
D.
deniesDoctrine
Indicates that one entity rejects, opposes, or refuses to accept the truth or validity of a particular doctrine associated with another entity.
-
E.
encouragedDoctrine
Indicates that an entity actively promoted or urged others to adopt or follow a particular doctrine or set of beliefs.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca831201b481909e137936ef99ff11 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:05 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb84c5121081908efa3eca25406d3a |
completed | March 31, 2026, 8:24 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cb70d70ea081909c3dc1bd2ec14f85 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 6:59 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69cb77690720819099de1e22b84a9563 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 7:27 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:06 p.m.