Triple
T8399089
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Cartesian circle |
E198125
|
entity |
| Predicate | allegedProblemFor |
P45135
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Descartes’ epistemological project |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Descartes’ epistemological project | Statement: [Cartesian circle, allegedProblemFor, Descartes’ epistemological project]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: allegedProblemFor Context triple: [Cartesian circle, allegedProblemFor, Descartes’ epistemological project]
-
A.
allegedUse
Indicates that something is claimed or suspected to have been used, without confirming that the use actually occurred.
-
B.
possibleIssue
chosen
Indicates that there is a potential or suspected problem, defect, or undesired condition associated with the referenced entity or situation, though it is not yet confirmed.
-
C.
involvesIssue
Indicates that an action, event, or entity is related to, concerns, or includes a particular issue.
-
D.
underlyingIssue
Indicates that one situation, problem, or condition is the fundamental cause or root problem behind another.
-
E.
allegedViolationSystem
Indicates a system is reported or suspected to have violated a rule, policy, or regulation, without the violation being legally or formally established.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca82f816bc8190ab321c07d72208c1 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:04 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb824ac29481909f02cdb2b7cd18af |
completed | March 31, 2026, 8:14 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cb70d24b248190a326aa6804f942b5 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 6:59 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:04 p.m.