Triple

T8387212
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Boumediene v. Bush E197844 entity
Predicate relatedCase P3137 FINISHED
Object Hamdi v. Rumsfeld E582776 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Hamdi v. Rumsfeld | Statement: [Boumediene v. Bush, relatedCase, Hamdi v. Rumsfeld]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Hamdi v. Rumsfeld
Context triple: [Boumediene v. Bush, relatedCase, Hamdi v. Rumsfeld]
  • A. Hamdi v. Rumsfeld chosen
    Hamdi v. Rumsfeld is a 2004 U.S. Supreme Court case that held American citizens designated as enemy combatants have the right to challenge their detention before a neutral decision-maker.
  • B. U.S. Supreme Court case Boumediene v. Bush
    Boumediene v. Bush is a landmark 2008 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held foreign detainees at Guantánamo Bay have a constitutional right to seek habeas corpus review in federal courts.
  • C. Hamdi
    Hamdi is a common given name and nickname in Arabic-speaking cultures, often used as a familiar or affectionate form of longer names such as Ahmed.
  • D. INS v. Chadha
    INS v. Chadha is a landmark 1983 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down the legislative veto as unconstitutional, significantly reshaping the balance of power between Congress and the executive branch.
  • E. Garcetti v. Ceballos
    Garcetti v. Ceballos is a 2006 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that public employees do not have First Amendment protection for speech made pursuant to their official job duties.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca82f749388190bffbea6dfb509016 completed March 30, 2026, 2:04 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cb81076eac8190893813628cacc1aa completed March 31, 2026, 8:08 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69ce1d1ffa988190a7b0a6b1017e144d completed April 2, 2026, 7:39 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:03 p.m.