Triple
T8383021
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Treaty of Payne’s Landing |
E197741
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasControversialAspect |
P81772
|
FINISHED |
| Object | legitimacy of Seminole consent |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: legitimacy of Seminole consent | Statement: [Treaty of Payne’s Landing, hasControversialAspect, legitimacy of Seminole consent]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasControversialAspect Context triple: [Treaty of Payne’s Landing, hasControversialAspect, legitimacy of Seminole consent]
-
A.
controversialBecause
Indicates that one entity is considered controversial specifically due to, or as a result of, its relationship with or association to another entity.
-
B.
roleInControversy
Indicates the specific part, involvement, or function an entity has within a particular controversy or disputed situation.
-
C.
controversyType
Indicates the specific kind or category of controversy associated with an entity or situation.
-
D.
controversialWork
Indicates that a work is the subject of significant public disagreement, debate, or dispute regarding its content, impact, or acceptability.
-
E.
controversialAtTimeOfProposal
Indicates that the proposal was subject to significant disagreement, debate, or public dispute at the time it was put forward.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca82f64c188190af4e1608036b865d |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:04 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb80ddc0f08190a90d4d9070bf713b |
completed | March 31, 2026, 8:07 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cb70cfe82881909fe374ba52649e84 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 6:59 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69cb76da264881909483b835e1db06da |
completed | March 31, 2026, 7:25 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:02 p.m.