Triple

T8375603
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject RFC 2572 E197566 entity
Predicate obsoletes P101 FINISHED
Object RFC 1907 E203677 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: RFC 1907 | Statement: [RFC 2572, obsoletes, RFC 1907]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: RFC 1907
Context triple: [RFC 2572, obsoletes, RFC 1907]
  • A. RFC 1907 chosen
    RFC 1907 is an earlier Internet standard that defined the Management Information Base (MIB) for SNMPv2, later superseded by RFC 3418.
  • B. RFC 1906
    RFC 1906 is an Internet standard that specifies the transport mappings for SNMPv2, detailing how SNMP messages are carried over various network protocols.
  • C. RFC 1657
    RFC 1657 is an early Internet standards document that defined SNMPv2 Management Information Base (MIB) extensions for managing BGP-4 routing protocol implementations.
  • D. RFC 1904
    RFC 1904 is an Internet standards document that originally defined the textual conventions for SNMPv2 before later being superseded by RFC 3410.
  • E. RFC 1497
    RFC 1497 is an early Internet standards document that defined vendor-specific extensions for the BOOTP protocol, laying groundwork later incorporated into DHCP.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca82f56730819080cec5d991c76f4c completed March 30, 2026, 2:04 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cb80bf6b8081909b98762b1f900bef completed March 31, 2026, 8:07 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69ce1d14baf88190bc260efda7d0fc0d completed April 2, 2026, 7:39 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:01 p.m.