Triple

T8374174
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Frank Hunter E197532 entity
Predicate romanticRelationshipStatus P82370 FINISHED
Object in an extramarital affair LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: in an extramarital affair | Statement: [Frank Hunter, romanticRelationshipStatus, in an extramarital affair]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: romanticRelationshipStatus
Context triple: [Frank Hunter, romanticRelationshipStatus, in an extramarital affair]
  • A. companionshipStatus
    Indicates the current state or condition of a relationship of companionship between two or more entities.
  • B. relationshipStatusDuringFilm
    Indicates the type or state of a relationship between entities specifically during the time period in which a film takes place or is produced.
  • C. relationshipDurationWith
    Indicates the length of time that a specified relationship between two entities has existed or is expected to last.
  • D. inRelationshipWith
    Indicates that two entities are mutually involved in a defined personal, romantic, or partnership relationship with each other.
  • E. spouseOrLover
    Indicates a romantic partnership between two entities, whether formalized as a spouse or existing as a lover.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca82f56730819080cec5d991c76f4c completed March 30, 2026, 2:04 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cb80a996ec819083ce2607c0cdab7f completed March 31, 2026, 8:07 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cb70cd04b08190ab5f72afd22a7967 completed March 31, 2026, 6:59 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69cb76d823b08190a54fadb50660cda5 completed March 31, 2026, 7:25 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:01 p.m.