Triple
T8371582
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Fire Brigades Union |
E197471
|
entity |
| Predicate | alsoKnownAs |
P39
|
FINISHED |
| Object | ex parte Fire Brigades Union |
E197471
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: ex parte Fire Brigades Union | Statement: [R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Fire Brigades Union, alsoKnownAs, ex parte Fire Brigades Union]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: ex parte Fire Brigades Union Context triple: [R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Fire Brigades Union, alsoKnownAs, ex parte Fire Brigades Union]
-
A.
R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Fire Brigades Union
chosen
R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Fire Brigades Union is a leading UK constitutional law case on the limits of the royal prerogative and the executive’s duty to implement legislation enacted by Parliament.
-
B.
Council of Civil Service Unions v Minister for the Civil Service
Council of Civil Service Unions v Minister for the Civil Service is a landmark 1985 UK public law case that established the justiciability of certain exercises of the royal prerogative and clarified the scope of judicial review.
-
C.
Guerin v. The Queen
Guerin v. The Queen is a landmark 1984 Supreme Court of Canada decision that established the federal government’s fiduciary duty toward Indigenous peoples in its management of reserve lands.
-
D.
Walsh v Lonsdale
Walsh v Lonsdale is an English contract and property law case that established the principle that equity regards as done that which ought to be done, allowing equitable leases to be treated as if they were legal leases.
-
E.
Briggs v. Elliott
Briggs v. Elliott was a landmark federal court case from South Carolina challenging racial segregation in public schools, and it became one of the key cases consolidated into Brown v. Board of Education.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca82f56730819080cec5d991c76f4c |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:04 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb80a509dc81909e0ea4c66b21d84f |
completed | March 31, 2026, 8:07 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69cde7d0a6d081909ffe138f80605992 |
completed | April 2, 2026, 3:51 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:01 p.m.