Triple

T8371499
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Council of Civil Service Unions v Minister for the Civil Service E197470 entity
Predicate hasShortName P1354 FINISHED
Object CCSU v Minister for the Civil Service E197470 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: CCSU v Minister for the Civil Service | Statement: [Council of Civil Service Unions v Minister for the Civil Service, hasShortName, CCSU v Minister for the Civil Service]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: CCSU v Minister for the Civil Service
Context triple: [Council of Civil Service Unions v Minister for the Civil Service, hasShortName, CCSU v Minister for the Civil Service]
  • A. Council of Civil Service Unions v Minister for the Civil Service chosen
    Council of Civil Service Unions v Minister for the Civil Service is a landmark 1985 UK public law case that established the justiciability of certain exercises of the royal prerogative and clarified the scope of judicial review.
  • B. Civil Service Tribunal
    The Civil Service Tribunal was a specialized judicial body of the European Union responsible for resolving disputes between the EU and its civil servants and staff.
  • C. Law for the Restoration of the Professional Civil Service
    The Law for the Restoration of the Professional Civil Service was a 1933 Nazi statute that purged Jews and political opponents from Germany’s civil service, marking an early legal step in the regime’s systematic persecution and exclusion policies.
  • D. Corrigan v. Buckley
    Corrigan v. Buckley is a 1926 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the enforceability of racially restrictive covenants in property deeds, paving the way for widespread legalized housing segregation until later overturned in effect by subsequent civil rights rulings.
  • E. R (Jackson) v Attorney General
    R (Jackson) v Attorney General is a landmark 2005 House of Lords case that examined the constitutional validity of legislation enacted under the Parliament Acts and explored fundamental principles about the limits of parliamentary sovereignty and the rule of law in the UK.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca82f56730819080cec5d991c76f4c completed March 30, 2026, 2:04 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cb80a509dc81909e0ea4c66b21d84f completed March 31, 2026, 8:07 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69cde7d0a6d081909ffe138f80605992 completed April 2, 2026, 3:51 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:01 p.m.