Triple
T8362429
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Polemarchus |
E197040
|
entity |
| Predicate | sibling |
P363
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Lysias |
E102660
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Lysias | Statement: [Polemarchus, sibling, Lysias]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Lysias Context triple: [Polemarchus, sibling, Lysias]
-
A.
Lysias
chosen
Lysias was a Seleucid general and regent who led royal forces against the Jewish rebels during the Maccabean Revolt in the 2nd century BCE.
-
B.
Aeschines of Sphettus
Aeschines of Sphettus was an ancient Athenian philosopher and writer of Socratic dialogues, known as one of the closest followers and literary portrayers of Socrates.
-
C.
Hypereides
Hypereides was a prominent Athenian orator and politician of the 4th century BCE, known for his role in the resistance against Macedonian influence and his skilled courtroom speeches.
-
D.
Gorgias
Gorgias is a Socratic dialogue by Plato that examines the nature of rhetoric, justice, and the good life through a debate between Socrates and the sophist Gorgias.
-
E.
Gorgias
Gorgias was a pre-Socratic Greek sophist and rhetorician renowned for his skillful, ornamental style of speech and his skeptical, paradoxical philosophical arguments.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca82f2dbe48190aba982e75a0d94de |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:04 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb8074e4588190b394d1622adca2cb |
completed | March 31, 2026, 8:06 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69cdc77cf2ac8190a1c5b618fd64da73 |
completed | April 2, 2026, 1:33 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6 p.m.