Triple
T8359870
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Chiquitano |
E196979
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Bolivian language |
C23936
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: Bolivian language Context triple: [Chiquitano, instanceOf, Bolivian language]
-
A.
Andean language
An Andean language is any of the indigenous languages historically spoken in the Andean region of South America, such as Quechua and Aymara, characterized by rich agglutinative morphology and deep cultural significance.
-
B.
Chibchan language
A Chibchan language is a member of a family of indigenous languages spoken primarily in Central America and northern South America, characterized by shared grammatical and phonological features reflecting a common ancestral origin.
-
C.
Quechuan language
A Quechuan language is any member of a family of indigenous languages of the Andes, primarily spoken in Peru, Bolivia, Ecuador, Colombia, and Argentina, that share common grammatical structures and vocabulary derived from a Proto-Quechuan ancestor.
-
D.
Cordilleran language
A Cordilleran language is a member of a proposed subgroup of the Austronesian language family spoken in the Cordillera mountain region of northern Luzon in the Philippines, characterized by shared phonological, lexical, and grammatical features distinct from neighboring language groups.
-
E.
Banda languages
Banda languages are a group of closely related Ubangian languages spoken primarily in the Central African Republic and neighboring regions, characterized by shared phonological and grammatical features.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca82f2dbe48190aba982e75a0d94de |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:04 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6 p.m.