Triple
T8357920
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Governorate of Estonia |
E196724
|
entity |
| Predicate | contains |
P35
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Järva County |
E395957
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Järva County | Statement: [Governorate of Estonia, contains, Järva County]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Järva County Context triple: [Governorate of Estonia, contains, Järva County]
-
A.
Järva County
chosen
Järva County is a historical and administrative region in central Estonia known for its rural landscapes and small towns.
-
B.
Viljandi County
Viljandi County is a rural administrative region in southern Estonia known for its lakes, forests, and historic town of Viljandi.
-
C.
Tartu County
Tartu County is an administrative region in eastern Estonia centered around the university city of Tartu and known for its cultural, educational, and economic significance.
-
D.
Lääne-Viru County
Lääne-Viru County is a northeastern administrative region of Estonia known for its coastal landscapes, historic manors, and the town of Rakvere.
-
E.
Võru County
Võru County is a rural region in southeastern Estonia known for its distinct South Estonian (Võro) linguistic and cultural heritage.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca82f08b348190bfb7881944bbff6f |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:04 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb806fa5c88190b23b6b3ee9d6ec6d |
completed | March 31, 2026, 8:06 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69ce029ea6b48190aca98c579a4fbe94 |
completed | April 2, 2026, 5:46 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:59 p.m.