Triple

T8353346
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Antofagasta plc E196614 entity
Predicate hasCommodityExposure P64308 FINISHED
Object copper price LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: copper price | Statement: [Antofagasta plc, hasCommodityExposure, copper price]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasCommodityExposure
Context triple: [Antofagasta plc, hasCommodityExposure, copper price]
  • A. hasExposuresIn
    Indicates that an entity is subject to or involved in certain risks, conditions, or influencing factors within a specified context, environment, or domain.
  • B. hasMiningCommodity chosen
    Indicates that an entity is associated with, produces, or contains a specific mining-related commodity.
  • C. commodityType
    Indicates the classification of a good or product according to its type or category within a commodity system.
  • D. handlesCommodity
    Indicates that one entity is responsible for dealing with, managing, or processing a particular commodity in some operational or transactional capacity.
  • E. hasTrade
    Indicates a relationship where one entity engages in or maintains a commercial exchange or trading activity with another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca82f08b348190bfb7881944bbff6f completed March 30, 2026, 2:04 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cb804756088190a766e1a486ccfdff completed March 31, 2026, 8:05 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cb70c6d0ec8190acf273b0e007b51a completed March 31, 2026, 6:59 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:59 p.m.