Triple
T8333484
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | The Great Partnership |
E195126
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasReview |
P66549
|
FINISHED |
| Object | received generally positive critical reception |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: received generally positive critical reception | Statement: [The Great Partnership, hasReview, received generally positive critical reception]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasReview Context triple: [The Great Partnership, hasReview, received generally positive critical reception]
-
A.
hasRecension
Indicates that one textual version or edition is a revised or alternative form of another text.
-
B.
hasReviewReception
chosen
Indicates that an entity has received a critical or evaluative review describing how it was received or perceived.
-
C.
hasReviewBody
Indicates that an entity has an associated textual review content or body describing an evaluation or opinion about it.
-
D.
hasReviewPeriod
Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific time span during which it is subject to review or evaluation.
-
E.
reviewedBy
Indicates that an item, work, or action has been examined and evaluated by a specific agent or reviewer.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca82e87f2c8190bdb71ee29dfc642d |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:04 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb7fbe61f481909cde8ab2c42f89fc |
completed | March 31, 2026, 8:03 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cb70c3231c81909e3d463192c9de22 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 6:59 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:57 p.m.