Triple
T8332924
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Taktser, Amdo, Tibet |
E195113
|
entity |
| Predicate | traditionalLanguage |
P6149
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Amdo Tibetan |
E109616
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Amdo Tibetan | Statement: [Taktser, Amdo, Tibet, traditionalLanguage, Amdo Tibetan]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Amdo Tibetan Context triple: [Taktser, Amdo, Tibet, traditionalLanguage, Amdo Tibetan]
-
A.
Tibetan
chosen
Tibetan is a Sino-Tibetan language spoken primarily in Tibet and surrounding Himalayan regions, serving as the liturgical language of Tibetan Buddhism and a key marker of Tibetan cultural identity.
-
B.
Yamphu language
The Yamphu language is a Kiranti Sino-Tibetan language spoken by the Yamphu ethnic community in eastern Nepal.
-
C.
Gyel dialect
The Gyel dialect is a regional variety of the Berom language spoken by the Berom people of central Nigeria.
-
D.
Bhutia
Bhutia is a Sino-Tibetan language spoken primarily by the Bhutia community in the Himalayan regions of India, especially in Sikkim and parts of West Bengal.
-
E.
Tangut
Tangut is an extinct Tibeto-Burman language once used in the Western Xia dynasty, best known today for its large and complex logographic writing system.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca82e87f2c8190bdb71ee29dfc642d |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:04 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb7fbce4048190838b5bca8e7b219c |
completed | March 31, 2026, 8:03 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69cd95d19178819090815692e847c4e0 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 10:01 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:57 p.m.