Triple
T8328989
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Council Directive 2001/86/EC |
E195027
|
entity |
| Predicate | typeOfInvolvement |
P82125
|
FINISHED |
| Object | information |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: information | Statement: [Council Directive 2001/86/EC, typeOfInvolvement, information]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typeOfInvolvement Context triple: [Council Directive 2001/86/EC, typeOfInvolvement, information]
-
A.
mayBeInvolvedIn
Indicates that an entity has a possible, but not certain, participation or role in a particular event, activity, or situation.
-
B.
hasBeenInvolvedIn
Indicates that an entity has participated in, taken part in, or been connected to a particular event, activity, or situation.
-
C.
oftenInvolvedWith
Indicates that one entity frequently participates in or is commonly associated with activities, events, or situations involving another entity.
-
D.
stillInvolvedIn
Indicates that an entity continues to participate in or be associated with a particular activity, role, or relationship at the present time.
-
E.
involves
Indicates that an entity participates in, is a part of, or is implicated within a particular event, process, or relationship.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca82e87f2c8190bdb71ee29dfc642d |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:04 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb7fb812508190aed8a283dacf712e |
completed | March 31, 2026, 8:03 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cb70c3231c81909e3d463192c9de22 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 6:59 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69cb76d823b08190a54fadb50660cda5 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 7:25 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:56 p.m.