Triple

T8323929
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Evenings at Home E194900 entity
Predicate coAuthorshipType P81941 FINISHED
Object sibling collaboration LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: sibling collaboration | Statement: [Evenings at Home, coAuthorshipType, sibling collaboration]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: coAuthorshipType
Context triple: [Evenings at Home, coAuthorshipType, sibling collaboration]
  • A. hasCoauthor
    Indicates that two or more entities have jointly authored the same work or publication.
  • B. coAuthorAlsoWrote
    Indicates that a person who is a co-author of one work also wrote another work, linking shared authorship across multiple creations.
  • C. coAuthorNationality
    Indicates that two or more co-authors of a work share the same nationality or have nationalities being related in the context of their co-authorship.
  • D. collaborationOf
    Indicates a relationship in which two or more entities work together jointly toward a shared goal or outcome.
  • E. collaboratorRole
    Indicates the specific function, position, or capacity in which one collaborator participates in a shared activity or project with another.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca82e7a8a88190a32bb5cc0feb012d completed March 30, 2026, 2:04 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cb7f7cf49c8190b8440ff01926a66a completed March 31, 2026, 8:02 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cb70bf689c8190a9d9b6b872abf53d completed March 31, 2026, 6:59 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69cb77690720819099de1e22b84a9563 completed March 31, 2026, 7:27 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:56 p.m.