Triple
T8315175
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ellis Boyd "Red" Redding |
E194687
|
entity |
| Predicate | eventuallyParoled |
P81883
|
FINISHED |
| Object | yes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Ellis Boyd "Red" Redding, eventuallyParoled, yes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: eventuallyParoled Context triple: [Ellis Boyd "Red" Redding, eventuallyParoled, yes]
-
A.
dateOfParole
Indicates the specific date on which an individual is officially released on parole.
-
B.
restrictionAfterPardon
Indicates that a restriction or limitation is imposed on an entity following the granting of a pardon.
-
C.
dateOfImprisonmentEnd
Indicates the date on which an entity’s period of imprisonment or incarceration comes to an end.
-
D.
legalStatusBeforeRelease
Indicates the legal condition or classification an entity was subject to prior to its release.
-
E.
paroleHearings
Indicates that one or more formal hearings are held to evaluate an incarcerated individual's eligibility or suitability for parole.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca82e6e2648190a31eaf6f4f757b2a |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:04 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb7f540b2081908ccb1b2ed040c74e |
completed | March 31, 2026, 8:01 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cb70bf689c8190a9d9b6b872abf53d |
completed | March 31, 2026, 6:59 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69cb77690720819099de1e22b84a9563 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 7:27 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:55 p.m.