Triple
T831432
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Morale Operations Branch |
E17972
|
entity |
| Predicate | successorInfluenceOn |
P19098
|
FINISHED |
| Object | postwar U.S. psychological warfare doctrine |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: postwar U.S. psychological warfare doctrine | Statement: [Morale Operations Branch, successorInfluenceOn, postwar U.S. psychological warfare doctrine]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: successorInfluenceOn Context triple: [Morale Operations Branch, successorInfluenceOn, postwar U.S. psychological warfare doctrine]
-
A.
hasSubsequentInfluence
chosen
Indicates that one entity has an influence or effect that occurs after, and is causally or temporally downstream from, another entity or event.
-
B.
successor
Indicates that one entity directly follows another in an ordered sequence or position.
-
C.
successorInIdea
Indicates that one idea conceptually follows, develops from, or replaces another in a sequence of intellectual progression.
-
D.
successorLine
Indicates that one line directly follows another in a sequence or ordered arrangement.
-
E.
eventualSuccessor
Indicates that one entity will become the successor of another at some later point in time, rather than immediately.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a4937c9c188190aaa216f6b466f452 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:29 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4abb4be948190ae757df85bdc40e4 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 9:12 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4aa7b3d2481909199f7c9f305bdfe |
completed | March 1, 2026, 9:07 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:38 p.m.