Triple

T8305300
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act E194448 entity
Predicate enhancesPowersOf P82640 FINISHED
Object federal banking regulators LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: federal banking regulators | Statement: [Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act, enhancesPowersOf, federal banking regulators]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: enhancesPowersOf
Context triple: [Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act, enhancesPowersOf, federal banking regulators]
  • A. powerUp
    Indicates an action where an entity increases or restores another entity’s energy, strength, or functional capacity.
  • B. invokesPower
    Indicates that one entity calls upon, activates, or makes use of the power, authority, or special ability associated with another entity.
  • C. powerUpBehavior
    Indicates how an entity changes state or acts when it gains a power-up or temporary enhancement.
  • D. powerBy
    Indicates that one entity operates, functions, or is made possible through the energy, resources, or enabling capabilities provided by another entity.
  • E. methodOfGainingPower
    Indicates the way or process through which an entity acquires or increases power.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca82e613e88190bf8139669bbd0d53 completed March 30, 2026, 2:04 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cb7e8db3a8819083772db5c7a2454b completed March 31, 2026, 7:58 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cb70bb3a708190bc705222092da614 completed March 31, 2026, 6:59 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69cb76d648988190ab0669cc0592e827 completed March 31, 2026, 7:25 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:54 p.m.