Triple
T8287690
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Samba |
E193822
|
entity |
| Predicate | enablesFunction |
P52687
|
FINISHED |
| Object | file sharing |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: file sharing | Statement: [Samba, enablesFunction, file sharing]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: enablesFunction Context triple: [Samba, enablesFunction, file sharing]
-
A.
enablesService
chosen
Indicates that one entity provides the capability or necessary conditions for another entity to offer or perform a specific service.
-
B.
usesFunction
Indicates that one entity employs, invokes, or relies on a particular function to perform an operation or achieve a result.
-
C.
enablingPowerFor
Indicates that one entity provides the capability or authority that allows another entity to perform a specific function, action, or role.
-
D.
enablesTechnology
Indicates that one entity makes it possible for another entity, system, or process to function through the use or provision of a particular technology.
-
E.
possibleFunction
Indicates that an entity may serve, or is capable of serving, a particular function or role, without asserting that it actually does so.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca82e32db481908b72f3804fa71152 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:04 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb7ad4b2008190ad1624e1335147c6 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 7:42 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cb70ad9fc081908741f8c4a4141edf |
completed | March 31, 2026, 6:58 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:52 p.m.