Triple
T8286005
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | OSR2.5 |
E193787
|
entity |
| Predicate | networkingCapabilities |
P36910
|
FINISHED |
| Object | TCP/IP networking |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: TCP/IP networking | Statement: [OSR2.5, networkingCapabilities, TCP/IP networking]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: networkingCapabilities Context triple: [OSR2.5, networkingCapabilities, TCP/IP networking]
-
A.
connectivityFeatures
chosen
Indicates the types of network or communication options that are available or supported for connecting to or through an entity.
-
B.
networkCharacteristic
Indicates a relationship where a specific property or feature is attributed to a network or networking context.
-
C.
displayCapabilities
Indicates the set of functions, features, or behaviors that an entity is able to present or support in a given context.
-
D.
capabilityType
Indicates the type or category of capability that an entity possesses or is associated with.
-
E.
developedCapability
Indicates that an entity has created, acquired, or brought into existence a particular capability through its actions or processes.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca82e32db481908b72f3804fa71152 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:04 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb7ad3722481908076508908d18621 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 7:42 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cb70ad9fc081908741f8c4a4141edf |
completed | March 31, 2026, 6:58 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:52 p.m.