Triple
T8285764
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | oVirt |
E193782
|
entity |
| Predicate | supportsRoleBasedAccessControl |
P82517
|
FINISHED |
| Object | yes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [oVirt, supportsRoleBasedAccessControl, yes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsRoleBasedAccessControl Context triple: [oVirt, supportsRoleBasedAccessControl, yes]
-
A.
supportsACLs
Indicates that one entity provides or is compatible with access control lists (ACLs) for managing permissions on another entity.
-
B.
requiresRole
Indicates that performing an action or accessing a resource is contingent on the subject having a specified role or set of roles.
-
C.
hasRole
Indicates that an entity occupies, performs, or is assigned a specific role or function in relation to another entity or context.
-
D.
securityRole
Indicates that an entity holds a specific security-related role, permission level, or access profile within a system or context.
-
E.
supportsRole
Indicates that one entity provides the necessary functionality, resources, or conditions for another entity to perform or occupy a specific role.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca82e32db481908b72f3804fa71152 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:04 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb7ad20ae481908179aba245c73fad |
completed | March 31, 2026, 7:42 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cb70ad9fc081908741f8c4a4141edf |
completed | March 31, 2026, 6:58 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69cb76d648988190ab0669cc0592e827 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 7:25 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:52 p.m.