Triple
T8285756
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | oVirt |
E193782
|
entity |
| Predicate | supportsHostManagement |
P82516
|
FINISHED |
| Object | yes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [oVirt, supportsHostManagement, yes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsHostManagement Context triple: [oVirt, supportsHostManagement, yes]
-
A.
supportsHosting
Indicates that one entity provides the necessary resources or capabilities for another entity to host or run something (such as an application, service, or content).
-
B.
supportsMediaManagement
Indicates that one entity provides functionality or assistance for organizing, handling, or controlling media content for another entity.
-
C.
hasStationManagement
Indicates that one entity is responsible for managing, operating, or overseeing the activities and administration of a station associated with another entity.
-
D.
supportsOnlineAccountManagement
Indicates that an entity provides functionality for users to manage their accounts through an online interface or platform.
-
E.
supportsKeyManagementProtocol
Indicates that one entity is capable of using or is compatible with a specified key management protocol for handling cryptographic keys.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca82e32db481908b72f3804fa71152 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:04 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb7ad20ae481908179aba245c73fad |
completed | March 31, 2026, 7:42 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cb70ad9fc081908741f8c4a4141edf |
completed | March 31, 2026, 6:58 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69cb76d648988190ab0669cc0592e827 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 7:25 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:52 p.m.