Triple
T8285240
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | FLASK security architecture |
E193772
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | mandatory access control framework |
C9690
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: mandatory access control framework Context triple: [FLASK security architecture, instanceOf, mandatory access control framework]
-
A.
mandatory access control system
chosen
A mandatory access control system is a security model in which access to resources is regulated by a central authority based on predefined policies and security labels, rather than by individual user discretion.
-
B.
security management framework
A security management framework is a structured set of policies, processes, roles, and controls that organizations use to systematically identify, assess, manage, and monitor security risks to their information and assets.
-
C.
authorization framework
An authorization framework is a structured system of rules, components, and processes that determines and enforces what actions users or services are permitted to perform on protected resources.
-
D.
cryptographic protocol framework
A cryptographic protocol framework is a structured set of tools, abstractions, and rules that enables the design, specification, analysis, and implementation of secure communication protocols.
-
E.
implementation mechanism for ICAO Standards and Recommended Practices
A structured set of legal, administrative, and technical processes through which States adopt, adapt, and apply ICAO Standards and Recommended Practices within their national civil aviation systems.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca82e217a48190880695635c44b2ed |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:04 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:52 p.m.