Triple
T8281483
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Mixe languages |
E193683
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasLanguage |
P15
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Atitlán Mixe |
E751570
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Atitlán Mixe | Statement: [Mixe languages, hasLanguage, Atitlán Mixe]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Atitlán Mixe Context triple: [Mixe languages, hasLanguage, Atitlán Mixe]
-
A.
Coatzospan Mixtec
Coatzospan Mixtec is an indigenous Oto-Manguean language spoken in the region of Coatzospan in Oaxaca, Mexico.
-
B.
Guichicovi Mixe
Guichicovi Mixe is a variant of the Mixe language spoken by the Mixe people in and around the municipality of San Juan Guichicovi in Oaxaca, Mexico.
-
C.
Alotepec Mixe
chosen
Alotepec Mixe is an indigenous Mixe language of Oaxaca, Mexico, spoken by the Mixe people in and around the community of Alotepec.
-
D.
Misantla Totonac
Misantla Totonac is an indigenous Totonacan language spoken in the Misantla region of Veracruz, Mexico.
-
E.
Teposcolula Mixtec
Teposcolula Mixtec is a variant of the Mixtec language spoken in and around the Teposcolula region of Oaxaca, Mexico, known for its tonal system and role in preserving local indigenous culture.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca82e217a48190880695635c44b2ed |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:04 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb79ef8508819098112a3397c96ca5 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 7:38 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69cf5127db38819087d5ba71b6064998 |
completed | April 3, 2026, 5:33 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:51 p.m.