Triple

T8278624
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Lyov E193608 entity
Predicate hasPhoneticApproximation P41705 FINISHED
Object /lyof/ in English transcription LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: /lyof/ in English transcription | Statement: [Lyov, hasPhoneticApproximation, /lyof/ in English transcription]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasPhoneticApproximation
Context triple: [Lyov, hasPhoneticApproximation, /lyof/ in English transcription]
  • A. isPhonetic
    Indicates that one entity represents the phonetic (sound-based) form or pronunciation of another entity.
  • B. usesPhoneticSystem chosen
    Indicates that one entity employs or is based on a particular phonetic system for representing or encoding sounds.
  • C. hasPhoneme
    Indicates that a linguistic unit (such as a word or morpheme) contains or includes a particular phoneme as part of its sound structure.
  • D. notFullyPhonetic
    Indicates that the representation of a word or utterance does not capture all of its sounds in a strictly phonetic manner.
  • E. hasPhonologicalBasisFor
    Indicates that one entity serves as the phonological source, motivation, or foundation for another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca82e217a48190880695635c44b2ed completed March 30, 2026, 2:04 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cb79ebb6b88190bc777b8bd72fcdbc completed March 31, 2026, 7:38 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cb70a4525481909399d313a6247ace completed March 31, 2026, 6:58 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:51 p.m.