Triple
T8276158
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Olmstead v. United States dissent |
E193551
|
entity |
| Predicate | rightsConcept |
P82448
|
FINISHED |
| Object | "right to be let alone" as central to individual liberty |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: "right to be let alone" as central to individual liberty | Statement: [Olmstead v. United States dissent, rightsConcept, "right to be let alone" as central to individual liberty]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: rightsConcept Context triple: [Olmstead v. United States dissent, rightsConcept, "right to be let alone" as central to individual liberty]
-
A.
rights
Indicates that an entity possesses entitlements, permissions, or legal/moral claims in relation to another entity or context.
-
B.
rightsCategory
Indicates the classification or type of rights associated with an entity or relationship.
-
C.
rightsInclude
Indicates that one set of rights encompasses, contains, or subsumes another set of rights.
-
D.
rightsManagement
Indicates the management, control, and enforcement of usage rights or permissions associated with an entity or resource.
-
E.
rightsRecognizedIn
Indicates that certain rights are formally acknowledged or upheld within a specified context, such as a legal system, jurisdiction, or document.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca82e14ae481908ffdb822cd2192bc |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:04 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb798d69508190b581ad8a38730175 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 7:36 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cb70a4525481909399d313a6247ace |
completed | March 31, 2026, 6:58 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69cb76d648988190ab0669cc0592e827 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 7:25 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:51 p.m.