Triple

T8276156
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Olmstead v. United States dissent E193551 entity
Predicate addressesTechnology P1485 FINISHED
Object telephone wiretapping LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: telephone wiretapping | Statement: [Olmstead v. United States dissent, addressesTechnology, telephone wiretapping]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: addressesTechnology
Context triple: [Olmstead v. United States dissent, addressesTechnology, telephone wiretapping]
  • A. addresses
    Indicates that one entity directs speech, communication, or written correspondence specifically toward another entity.
  • B. technologyBasis
    Indicates that one entity is founded on, enabled by, or fundamentally relies upon the technology provided or represented by another entity.
  • C. technicalContact
    Indicates that one entity serves as the primary point of contact for technical issues, support, or maintenance related to another entity.
  • D. addressesWork
    Indicates that one entity directs or delivers work-related communication or correspondence to another entity.
  • E. associatedWithTechnology chosen
    Indicates a relationship where an entity is connected to, involved with, or utilizes a particular technology.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca82e14ae481908ffdb822cd2192bc completed March 30, 2026, 2:04 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cb798d69508190b581ad8a38730175 completed March 31, 2026, 7:36 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cb70a4525481909399d313a6247ace completed March 31, 2026, 6:58 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:51 p.m.