Triple

T8264012
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Special Fraud Alerts E193257 entity
Predicate exampleTopic P81571 FINISHED
Object laboratory billing practices LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: laboratory billing practices | Statement: [Special Fraud Alerts, exampleTopic, laboratory billing practices]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: exampleTopic
Context triple: [Special Fraud Alerts, exampleTopic, laboratory billing practices]
  • A. exampleType
    Indicates that one entity serves as a representative or illustrative instance of the type or category defined by another entity.
  • B. featuresTopic
    Indicates that something (such as a work, event, or item) prominently includes, focuses on, or is organized around a particular topic.
  • C. legacyTopic
    Indicates that a topic or subject is considered outdated, superseded, or retained only for backward compatibility or historical reasons.
  • D. primaryTopicOf
    Indicates that a given subject is the main or central topic described by another resource (such as a document, page, or record).
  • E. exampleApplication
    Indicates that something serves as a representative or illustrative instance of how an application is used or functions.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca82e081d48190986beaa51f498ab9 completed March 30, 2026, 2:04 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cb793aa8f08190b20b3616ceb9bec7 completed March 31, 2026, 7:35 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cb36b8707881909aca349230495a5a completed March 31, 2026, 2:51 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69cb4ab5162c8190bddd696078689895 completed March 31, 2026, 4:16 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:49 p.m.