Triple
T8260289
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Grand Forks County |
E193174
|
entity |
| Predicate | bordersProvince |
P224
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Manitoba |
E15186
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Manitoba | Statement: [Grand Forks County, bordersProvince, Manitoba]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Manitoba Context triple: [Grand Forks County, bordersProvince, Manitoba]
-
A.
Manitoba
chosen
Manitoba is a central Canadian province known for its vast prairies, numerous lakes, and northern boreal forests.
-
B.
Saskatchewan
Saskatchewan is a prairie and boreal province in western Canada known for its vast flat landscapes, agriculture, and significant natural resources.
-
C.
Alberta
Alberta is a western Canadian province known for its vast prairies, Rocky Mountains, and significant natural resource industries.
-
D.
Emerson, Manitoba
Emerson, Manitoba is a small Canadian border town in southern Manitoba situated along the Red River near the U.S. state of North Dakota.
-
E.
Great Plains Province
The Great Plains Province is a vast, mostly flat to gently rolling region of central North America characterized by grasslands, prairies, and extensive agricultural use.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca82e081d48190986beaa51f498ab9 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:04 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb793479d08190bd0dd8740bebff95 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 7:35 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69cd94ad3af481909ec2fcc296cab4a8 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 9:57 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:49 p.m.