Triple
T8252805
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Myers v. United States |
E192995
|
entity |
| Predicate | presidentialActionChallenged |
P15327
|
FINISHED |
| Object | removal of a first-class postmaster without Senate consent |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: removal of a first-class postmaster without Senate consent | Statement: [Myers v. United States, presidentialActionChallenged, removal of a first-class postmaster without Senate consent]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: presidentialActionChallenged Context triple: [Myers v. United States, presidentialActionChallenged, removal of a first-class postmaster without Senate consent]
-
A.
constitutionalChallenge
Indicates a legal action or argument asserting that a law, policy, or governmental act violates a constitution and should be reviewed or invalidated.
-
B.
canImpeach
Indicates that one entity has the authority or power to formally impeach another entity.
-
C.
impeachmentInitiation
Indicates the formal start of a process to charge and potentially remove a public official from office for alleged misconduct.
-
D.
challengedStatute
Indicates that a particular statute or law is being contested, questioned, or disputed, typically in a legal or constitutional proceeding.
-
E.
precedentChallenged
chosen
Indicates that an existing legal precedent is being questioned, disputed, or formally contested.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca82dfad9c8190b8cd18fb89f50f40 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:04 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb78cbc7cc81909931440e95d6e691 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 7:33 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cb36b6d5548190b665a6cce14c69f7 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 2:51 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:48 p.m.