Triple

T824999
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Ruby, Don’t Take Your Love to Town E17833 entity
Predicate lyricalMotif P4921 FINISHED
Object plea for fidelity LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: plea for fidelity | Statement: [Ruby, Don’t Take Your Love to Town, lyricalMotif, plea for fidelity]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: lyricalMotif
Context triple: [Ruby, Don’t Take Your Love to Town, lyricalMotif, plea for fidelity]
  • A. lyricalPerspective
    Indicates the narrative or point of view from which lyrics are expressed in a song or vocal piece.
  • B. hasLyricalTheme chosen
    Indicates that one entity (typically a creative work) features or is characterized by a particular lyrical subject, topic, or theme.
  • C. hasLyricalStyle
    Indicates that one entity possesses or is characterized by a particular lyrical style in relation to another entity or context.
  • D. notableSongCharacteristic
    Indicates that a song is distinguished by a particular notable feature or quality, such as style, structure, or performance trait.
  • E. hasLyricsTheme
    Indicates that the lyrics of a work primarily concern or revolve around a specified theme or subject.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a4937c9c188190aaa216f6b466f452 completed March 1, 2026, 7:29 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4ab7eb0a08190889463edb0e7bd59 completed March 1, 2026, 9:11 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a4aa781e1081909df006f730296c53 completed March 1, 2026, 9:07 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:38 p.m.