Triple
T8241035
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Dionysodorus |
E192533
|
entity |
| Predicate | goalInDebate |
P81097
|
FINISHED |
| Object | victory in argument |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: victory in argument | Statement: [Dionysodorus, goalInDebate, victory in argument]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: goalInDebate Context triple: [Dionysodorus, goalInDebate, victory in argument]
-
A.
keyFigureInDebate
Indicates that an entity plays a central, influential, or prominently recognized role in a particular debate or controversy.
-
B.
mainDebateTopic
Indicates that a specified subject or issue is the primary focus or central topic of a particular debate or discussion.
-
C.
fieldOfDebate
Indicates that something is the subject or domain around which a debate or argumentative discussion is centered.
-
D.
enteredPoliticalDebateIn
Indicates that an entity took part in a political debate that occurred in a specified place or context.
-
E.
canDebate
Indicates that one entity has the ability or permission to engage in a debate or argumentative discussion with another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca82dc8f148190a2c75a98501a7b91 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:04 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb783e13648190abf34eb8c244ea17 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 7:31 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cb36b437e881909958591357e83b9d |
completed | March 31, 2026, 2:51 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69cb447c146081909decf97bbd26c496 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 3:50 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:47 p.m.