Triple
T8228918
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ιωάννης Κωλέττης |
E192239
|
entity |
| Predicate | θεωρείται |
P1120
|
FINISHED |
| Object | εμπνευστής της Μεγάλης Ιδέας |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: εμπνευστής της Μεγάλης Ιδέας | Statement: [Ιωάννης Κωλέττης, θεωρείται, εμπνευστής της Μεγάλης Ιδέας]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: θεωρείται Context triple: [Ιωάννης Κωλέττης, θεωρείται, εμπνευστής της Μεγάλης Ιδέας]
-
A.
considered
chosen
Indicates that one entity regards, judges, or thinks about another entity in a particular way or context.
-
B.
theorized
Indicates that one entity has proposed or developed a theoretical explanation or hypothesis about another entity or phenomenon.
-
C.
considersItself
Indicates that an entity regards or perceives itself in a particular way, role, or state.
-
D.
consideredIn
Indicates that one entity is taken into account, examined, or included as a factor within the context, scope, or decision framework of another entity.
-
E.
couldConsider
Indicates that one entity has the potential or option to take another entity into account when making a decision, judgment, or evaluation.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca82db5b90819085d1ad7c2e27bfcc |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:04 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb780051988190adb47c02e0dcea51 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 7:30 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cb36b1dea0819091418072501e79c1 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 2:51 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:46 p.m.