Triple
T8220477
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Windows Sidebar |
E192045
|
entity |
| Predicate | alternativePosition |
P6870
|
FINISHED |
| Object | left side of the screen |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: left side of the screen | Statement: [Windows Sidebar, alternativePosition, left side of the screen]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: alternativePosition Context triple: [Windows Sidebar, alternativePosition, left side of the screen]
-
A.
secondaryPosition
chosen
Indicates that an entity holds an additional, non-primary role, location, or status alongside its main one.
-
B.
positionA
Indicates the spatial or ordered position of an entity A within a defined reference frame or sequence.
-
C.
alternativeForm
Indicates that one entity is an alternative version, variant, or representation of another entity.
-
D.
positionedAgainst
Indicates that one entity is placed so that it directly faces or is set opposite to another entity, often in close or contacting alignment.
-
E.
alternateDescription
Indicates that an entity has an additional or substitute textual description that can be used in place of its primary description.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca82c9a8ac81908b011c38698456e4 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:03 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb77c782a8819086019ab6bac05749 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 7:29 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cb36af41e081909dee92b9bc4947f1 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 2:51 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:45 p.m.