Triple

T8215890
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject The Special One E191929 entity
Predicate associatedWithPersona P61233 FINISHED
Object self-confident coach LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: self-confident coach | Statement: [The Special One, associatedWithPersona, self-confident coach]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: associatedWithPersona
Context triple: [The Special One, associatedWithPersona, self-confident coach]
  • A. originallyAssociatedWith
    Indicates that an entity was first linked, connected, or affiliated with another entity before any later changes in association.
  • B. isAssociatedWith
    Indicates that there exists a connection, relationship, or involvement between two entities without specifying its exact nature.
  • C. hasPersona chosen
    Indicates that an entity possesses or is associated with a particular persona, role, or character profile.
  • D. associatedWithFront
    Indicates a relationship where one entity is linked or connected specifically to the front part, side, or face of another entity.
  • E. associatedName
    Indicates that one entity has an alternative or related name that is linked or connected to another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca82c8c054819087fedd9a5436b8a3 completed March 30, 2026, 2:03 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cb776dcfa08190969863b886336c91 completed March 31, 2026, 7:27 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cb36ad01ac81909609b15f6a6c8581 completed March 31, 2026, 2:51 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:44 p.m.