Triple

T8211805
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Maghaberry Prison E191834 entity
Predicate holdsCategory P15481 FINISHED
Object Category A equivalent prisoners LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Category A equivalent prisoners | Statement: [Maghaberry Prison, holdsCategory, Category A equivalent prisoners]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: holdsCategory
Context triple: [Maghaberry Prison, holdsCategory, Category A equivalent prisoners]
  • A. hasCategoryOn chosen
    Indicates that something is assigned to or associated with a specific category within a given context or scope.
  • B. holdingType
    Indicates the type or category of a holding or possession that one entity has in relation to another or to an asset.
  • C. hasRetailCategory
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific retail category or type of retail business.
  • D. containsCategory
    Indicates that one entity includes or encompasses a specific category as part of its classification or organizational structure.
  • E. typicallyHolds
    Indicates that a certain relationship or condition generally holds true in typical or normal situations, though not necessarily in all cases.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca82c8c054819087fedd9a5436b8a3 completed March 30, 2026, 2:03 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cb76dec42c819090252fe186a68d34 completed March 31, 2026, 7:25 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cb36ad01ac81909609b15f6a6c8581 completed March 31, 2026, 2:51 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:44 p.m.