Triple
T8194450
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Daniel Donnelly et al. |
E191391
|
entity |
| Predicate | SupremeCourtVote |
P81431
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 5-4 against their Establishment Clause claim |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 5-4 against their Establishment Clause claim | Statement: [Daniel Donnelly et al., SupremeCourtVote, 5-4 against their Establishment Clause claim]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: SupremeCourtVote Context triple: [Daniel Donnelly et al., SupremeCourtVote, 5-4 against their Establishment Clause claim]
-
A.
majorityJustices
Indicates that the referenced justices constitute more than half of the members of the relevant court or judicial panel in a given decision or context.
-
B.
chiefJusticeAtDecision
Indicates that the specified person was serving as the chief justice at the time a particular decision was made.
-
C.
pluralityJustices
Indicates that the referenced justices formed a plurality—receiving more support than any other opinion but not a majority—in a judicial decision.
-
D.
supremeCourtOf
Indicates that one entity serves as the highest judicial authority (supreme court) within the jurisdiction or legal system of another entity.
-
E.
succeededInSupremeCourtSeatBy
Indicates that one individual directly followed another in occupying the same seat on the Supreme Court.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca82c6e9548190a4c5ca14516e4417 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:03 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb5c1f02248190adbe56a7d6be3419 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 5:31 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cb36aac86081909b83636e352e0ced |
completed | March 31, 2026, 2:51 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69cb46635424819085d086972b264280 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 3:58 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:42 p.m.