Triple

T8192504
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Lord Keeper of the Great Seal E191344 entity
Predicate usedSealFor P10498 FINISHED
Object formalizing acts of state LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: formalizing acts of state | Statement: [Lord Keeper of the Great Seal, usedSealFor, formalizing acts of state]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usedSealFor
Context triple: [Lord Keeper of the Great Seal, usedSealFor, formalizing acts of state]
  • A. usedSeal chosen
    Indicates that an entity has applied or employed a seal (e.g., for closure, authentication, or protection) on another entity.
  • B. usesSealImage
    Indicates that one entity employs or incorporates the seal image of another entity in some context or medium.
  • C. isSealed
    Indicates that an entity is closed off or secured so that nothing can enter, exit, or be altered.
  • D. sealedBy
    Indicates that one entity is closed, secured, or made airtight/watertight through the action or presence of another entity.
  • E. inscriptionUsedWith
    Indicates that a particular inscription is employed together with, or in association with, another object, tool, or context in which it is applied or interpreted.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca82c5b6948190a583c096fb0a6c71 completed March 30, 2026, 2:03 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cb5c1d7aa48190adbbce88b3bed1a3 completed March 31, 2026, 5:31 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cb36aac86081909b83636e352e0ced completed March 31, 2026, 2:51 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:42 p.m.